|
Introduction
World-wide
epidemiological studies carried out in the past
two decades suggest that up to 80% of human cancers,
in particular bowel cancer, stomach cancer, breast
cancer and head and neck cancer, are induced by
what we eat and drink. Cancer of the prostate
and of the pancreas are also affected by dietary
factors, but to a much lesser extent.
The
Large Bowel
Cancer
of the large bowel is found mostly in affluent,
highly-developed countries and it is much more
common in urban areas than in rural, sparsely
populated districts in those countries. Furthermore,
there seems to be a direct link between the consumption
of meat and the frequency of bowel cancer. This
disease is virtually unknown in Tibet and Thailand,
where practically no meat is consumed. It occurs
with moderate frequency in Japan and Chile, where
modest amounts of meat are consumed, but the highest
incidence of bowel cancer occurs in Scotland,
Canada, New Zealand, Australia and the USA, which
are countries with the largest meat consumption.
In
1985 130,000 cases of bowel and rectum cancer
were diagnosed in the US, of which 65,000 died.
A further piece of conclusive evidence about the
link between diet and bowel cancer is provided
by the US black population. American blacks have
shown a dramatic increase in bowel cancer following
the introduction of the Bill of Rights and their
resulting affluence. This has raised their standard
of living and has enabled them to copy the diet
of whites, including daily consumption of large
amounts of meat. The extremely high bowel cancer
rate in American Negroes stands in marked contrast
to Negroes in Africa, among whom bowel cancer
is virtually unknown.
Evidence
to show lower incidence of bowel cancer because
of a higher consumption of cereals, fruit and
vegetables in their diet, is provided by US Mormons
and Seventh Day Adventists in California. Similar
evidence also comes from other parts of the world.
For instance, in India, the Parsees who eat a
Western-style diet suffer from bowel cancer much
more frequently than the general Hindu population.
Further
very convincing evidence is provided by Japanese
migrants who have settled in Hawaii or California
and who, on adopting a Western-style diet, including
large beef consumption, have shown a parallel
rise in cancer of the large bowel after one generation.
What,
therefore, has been shown by these studies is
that it is not only high meat consumption but
a diet low in vegetables, particularly cabbage,
broccoli and Brussel sprouts, which appears to
increase the likelihood of developing cancer of
the colon.
Similarly,
a high-fibre diet seems to have a protective effect
as shown by the low incidence of bowel cancer
in rural Africans, as well as in Israelis of Asian
or African origin who eat fibre-rich food.
Summary
World-wide
studies have confirmed conclusively that a diet
high in total fat and high in red meat, especially
when it is also low in fibre, vegetables and the
mineral selenium (p. 85), is associated with a
significantly increased incidence of large-bowel
cancer. The disease eventually develops in approximately
6 per cent of the American population, and six
million Americans who are alive today will die
of it.
The
Stomach
Cancer
of the stomach is known to occur more frequently
in lower class Western males around the age of
55 years. The incidence of stomach cancer can
be lowered by eating Western-type vegetables,
such as lettuce, tomatoes, celery and corn, whereas
eating Japanese-style salted, seasoned, spiced
or cured food tends to raise the frequency of
stomach cancer.
Nitrites
and nitrates are chemical substances containing
nitrogen which are present in human saliva. These
substances have been shown to cause stomach cancer
in experiments on animals. Their role in human
cancer is a complex one, but they do not appear
to increase the risk of stomach cancer in people,
particularly when they are eaten together with
fruit, vegetables and salads. It is thought that
they are neutralised by the high Vitamin C content
of these foods. This is one reason why fresh vegetables
and fruit should be eaten throughout the year,
rather than seasonally. It is worth repeating
that a reduced salt intake is beneficial as regards
avoiding stomach cancer.
The
Breast
Convincing
epidemiological evidence is available to show
that diet is one of the many contributory factors
to breast cancer. In Western countries the incidence
of breast cancer continues to rise after the menopause,
whereas it remains the same in Japan. This difference
is believed to be due to dietary practices in
the high-risk countries of the West. This belief
is reinforced by the increased incidence over
the past 40 years of breast cancer in American
blacks. This again is thought to be due to eating
more of the rich food now available to them as
the result of their improved earning capacity.
Similarly,
the latter-day increase of breast cancer in Japanese
women is thought to be related to the recent shift
of the Japanese to a more Western-style diet with
a particular increase in fat consumption. This
is known to affect the hormones associated with
breast tissue.
The
Oesophagus
Alcohol
and tobacco are known to interact and reinforce
each other’s detrimental effect in the production
of cancer. Too much of both increases the risk
proneness to oesophageal cancer. There are a number
of oesophageal-cancer ‘hot-spots’ in Western Europe,
North America and the wheat-eating (as opposed
to the rice-eating) parts of China.
When
alcohol intake is excessive it can destroy hunger,
seriously depress appetite and interfere with
absorption of nutrients, vitamins and minerals.
This can lead to an unbalanced diet and nutritional
deficiencies which give rise to cancer.
The
Pancreas
High
fat consumption and over-eating are associated
with an increased incidence of cancer of the pancreas.
It is this excessively rich type of diet which
has been linked with the climbing rates of pancreatic
cancer in the West, particularly among American
Jews who eat food much richer in fat than Jews
of Asian or African origin. Dietary fats are thought
to create carcinogens in the bile and cause it
to flow back into the pancreas.
The
Prostate
There
is a marked difference, both geographic and racial,
between Western countries (including the USA and
Britain) where prostatic cancer is common, and
Japan and Africa where it is rare, as well as
between the US black and white population, where
the incidence is greater among blacks. Yet African
blacks have a much lower incidence than even American
whites, which suggests that environment affects
American blacks. An important factor appears to
be population density, as there are fewer deaths
from prostatic carcinoma in sparsely populated
areas in the USA. When prostates in men who have
died from other conditions are examined through
a microscope, unsuspected cancer is found in about
45 per cent of all men over the age of 50, but
it is only in affluent societies that they seem
to develop into active malignant lesions. This
is probably caused by increased hormone production,
resulting from over eating.
There
is an interesting scientific relationship parallel
between the incidence of prostatic cancer and
that of breast and colon cancer. When comparing
the high- and low-risk areas in the world, the
one striking difference was found to be the intake
of fat. In the high-risk areas the intake is double
(40 per cent of the total calorie intake) that
of the low risk regions (20 per cent of the total
calorie intake). When comparing geographic areas
in the United States in relation to their whole-milk
and beef consumption (as a measure of the fat-intake
of the respective populations) it is found that
the north-central and mid-west areas, with the
highest fat consumption also have the highest
prostatic-cancer mortality rate.
Like
breast cancer, prostatic cancer is hormone-dependent
and any factor, such as diet, affecting hormonal
secretion, also influences the frequency of prostatic
cancer. It is interesting to note that, in fact,
a vegetarian diet was found to lower the prostatic
cancer rate, possibly because of a decreased overnight
release of such hormones as testosterone.
Our
Daily Bread
Our
life expectancy is longer now than it was 200
years ago. It is longer, not because we are healthier
but because of our greatly improved public health
measures, in particular:
- vaccination
against smallpox, tetanus, whooping cough, diphtheria
and infantile paralysis
- sterilisation
of water supplies
- compulsory
pasteurisation of all milk.
In
fact our health is worse and this is due, to a
large extent, to our food which is richer, softer
and sweeter than ever before. It is richer because
we eat more fat; it is softer because it is processed
and refined to a high degree and has lost its
natural fibre content (together with other nutrients)
and it is sweeter because our greatly increased
consumption of sugar makes us prefer sweet foods,
which manufacturers are very happy to supply.
We
already know what eating habits cause cancer and
so must realise that by changing these eating
habits we could avoid cancer and that the choice
is ours, even if we decide to do nothing about
it. Just as we assume (wrongly) that it is normal
for old people to lose their mobility and energy,
to suffer from rheumatism, arthritis and chestiness,
to become overweight and lose some of their mental
alertness, so we accept (again wrongly) cancer
and heart disease to be part of our normal lives
today; they certainly are not normal and the evidence
that they need not be is clear.
There
are about 40 substances that we should eat for
good health, but no longer do; instead we fill
ourselves with refined, high-calorie food, rich
in fat and sugar and, as a result of feeling full,
leave out certain food items which the body cannot
do without. Too few of us realise that eating
what we like and eating healthily are compatible
and that as food and health are so closely related,
our choice of food also decides our state of health.
There
are two main reasons for eating: firstly we provide
the body with nutrients for tissue growth and
repair; and secondly, we eat for fun, which is
obviously the more pleasurable one of the two,
although rarely healthy.
Since
it is food we eat, not nutrients, we need to find
out which of the three main types of food (proteins,
fats and carbohydrates) are most required for
good health.
Proteins
Proteins
are the main body-building and repair foods. The
most concentrated sources are found in meat, fish,
cheese, milk, eggs, nuts and soya beans. Other,
smaller sources of protein are wheat and pulses.
The total daily protein requirement is only 45g
((fl. oz.) and should represent no more than 10
per cent of our daily food intake.
Fats
Fats
give long-term energy because they take longer
to be digested and absorbed into the system. They
are found in foods as visible fats like lard,
suet, cooking fat, oil, butter, margarine, cream
and fat on meat, and as invisible fats in milk,
fatty meat, cheese and oily fish. Small quantities
are even contained in cereals. Vegetables and
fruit, apart from avocado pears and olives, contain
a very small amount of fat. When chemically analysed,
fats contain, as part of their make-up, substances
known as fatty acids. These come in three types:
Saturated
Fatty Acids
These
are found mostly in foods of mainly animal origin.
Over long periods, eating too much food containing
saturated fatty acids tends to increase the blood
cholesterol level. These fats are found in cream,
cheese, milk fat, butter, meat fat, cooking fat,
dripping, lard, suet, coconut and palm oils, cocoa
and chocolate, and in hard and soft margarines
which are not specifically polyunsaturated.
Mono-unsaturated
Fatty Acids
These
fats neither raise nor lower blood cholesterol
levels. However, they do add to the total daily
fat (and energy) intake, and foods containing
them also have some saturated fatty acids as well.
They are found in largest amounts in olive oil,
peanut oil, olives, and avocado pears.
Polyunsaturated
Fatty Acids
These
tend to lower blood cholesterol levels. They are
found in safflower, sunflower, corn and soya-bean
oil. Polyunsaturated margarines are a convenient
source of this type of fatty acid. However, even
the highest polyunsaturated fats are only 72 per
cent poly, the rest being mono and saturated fat.
Essential
Fatty Acids
Three
fats are referred to collectively as Vitamin F.
Although required in only very small amounts,
they are nevertheless essential to health (that
is why they are called essential fatty acids or
EFA). They must be supplied in such foods as milk,
cheese, eggs, nuts, sunflower or corn oil, linseed
or wheatgerm.
The
total daily fat allowance should be below 20 per
cent (not as at present, over 40 per cent) of
the daily food intake, that is less than 50g ((fl.
oz.).). For instance, butter is pure fat, as is
margarine. Cheese is equally unhealthy, because
it is concentrated fat. If women, in particular,
continue eating it in anything but small amounts
they might just as well spread it on their thighs,
because sooner or later that is where it will
surely end up! Low-fat cheese is better, but no
cheese is best. Other whole-cream milk products
should also be struck off one’s shopping list.
In fact, anything with the word cream in it is
better omitted: cream cheese, whipped cream, ice
cream, cream soup, sour cream and so on. If we
substitute the word fat for cream and call them
fat cheese, whipped fat, ice fat, fat soup or
sour fat, because that is what they all are, it
may be easier to give them up. Mayonnaise is also
bad; it is full of fat and salt; one tablespoon
has the calories contained in two tablespoons
of white sugar. On the other hand, low-fat yoghurt
is a wonderful substitute for sour cream, for
instance in a baked potato.
Cholesterol
Cholesterol
is a fat which is found in the blood. It is one
of the main factors contributing to heart disease
and as a fat also represents a cancer risk. It
is manufactured in the body but it is also supplied
in food; there are four food-groups:
- Cholesterol-free:
all plants, vegetables and their products.
- Low
cholesterol: skimmed milk and low-fat yoghurt.
- Medium
cholesterol: fish, lean meats, whole milk and
cheese.
- High
cholesterol: all offal (such as heart, liver,
brain, sweetbread), roes, shrimps, prawns, Stilton,
Cheddar and egg yolk.
Red
meat also contains a lot of hidden fat; veal is
leaner; skinless chicken is better but fish is
even healthier; like cheese, meat is best left
out altogether. This also goes for fried food.
Grill, steam, boil or bake instead.
Carbohydrates
There
are two groups of carbohydrates. Natural, also
called complex, carbohydrates are known as the
‘good guys’. The simple processed or refined carbohydrates
like white sugar are the bad guys’, and contain
sugar in the form of sucrose.
The
natural carbohydrates are fruit, vegetables and
whole grain products such as bread, cereals, flour,
potatoes, rice, maize and pasta. They convert
slowly into blood sugar and supply us with vitamins,
minerals and roughage; they are the desirable
ones.
The
bad guys’, those in soft drinks, colas, white
bread, and sugary cereals are empty calories with
little nutritional value. They are rapidly converted
into glucose in the blood; they cause sugar imbalances,
they exhaust the pancreas and can eventually lead
to diabetes. They include all forms of sugar,
whether white, brown, raw, or Demerara, glucose,
syrup, treacle, molasses, jam and marmalades and
also honey (which contains fructose not sucrose).
Fructose is also found naturally in all fruits
and in this form is easier to digest without putting
a strain on the pancreas.
Obesity
Obesity
is a pre-cancerous stage. Avoid obesity and you
can avoid cancer. There is a direct link between
opulence, overweight and the cancers of affluence.
Fats
and sugar are the two ‘high-calorie risk’ food
components in any diet; they are needed by the
body solely as a source of energy for heavy physical
work and for athletic pursuits. In the absence
of such physical activities, too much fat and/or
sugar taken regularly will inevitably lead to
fat storage and weight gain. Fat has the highest
calorie content per volume and eating butter and
margarine, or constantly frying foods in cooking
fats or oil, will greatly increase calorie consumption.
Each
¼lb (120g) packet of butter or margarine
provides over 1,000 calories. Fat forms at least
40 per cent of the total calorie content of cakes,
biscuits, pastries, puddings, potato crisps, peanuts,
chocolate and chocolate-covered sweets, sauces,
cream soups, salad cream, sausages, mayonnaise,
beef burgers, most meats, all fried food, cream,
eggs, whole milk and cheese.
Of
the carbohydrates consumed, one-third is taken
as sugar and half of this is used in tea or coffee
and the rest in manufactured and cooked foods.
Sugar should be reduced to the status of a condiment,
not only on account of its calorie content but
because together with fibre deficiency, it alters
the dominant type of colon bacteria, thus increasing
the risk of cancer of colon and rectum.
Drinking
a total of five cups of either tea or coffee a
day, with two teaspoons of sugar in each cup,
gives 225 empty calories; most people throw away
10 per cent of their daily calorie intake on non-food.
Similarly, alcohol provides no nutrition - only
calories. A percentage of these surplus calories,
not needed to fuel the body with energy, is then
stored as body fat and this is what makes people
overweight.
To
lose weight, the amount of dietary fat and sugar
taken must be reduced. Reduction of the complex
carbohydrates is not a good thing because fibre-rich
starchy foods are an essential part of a complete,
balanced, healthy diet. Most people are, or at
least should be, aware that short-term rapid weight
loss with rigorous diets depends on loss of body
water (with glycogen and protein) not body fat.
It takes months for many overweight people to
lose the actual excess fat. A weight reduction
of 21b ((1kg) per week is the maximum loss desirable
for the majority of adults. After weight loss,
the energy intake should be permanently adjusted
in order to avoid regaining weight; this can be
achieved by increasing consumption of wholemeal
bread and wholegrain cereals (high-fibre content),
vegetables and fruit. Food rich in fat (meat products
and fried food) and those rich in sugar have to
be restricted on a long-term basis.
Behavioural
Slimming
Behaviour
slimming is based on the idea that overweight
people wishing to slim need first to be told how
to recognise what causes their current bad habits.
Then they must be shown how to invent methods
to overcome these problems and so establish new,
better patterns of behaviour. Few obese people
are aware, for example, that they eat a great
part of their food while walking about the house
doing other tasks. They need to become conscious
of this so that they can regulate their eating
pattern. Those who wish to slim should have meals
in a setting where they can appreciate that they
have had a meal, without other distractions. In
this way snacks between meals can be avoided,
because the routine for meals has to be followed
at all times. Many people eat more when they are
bored, tired or under stress, so slimmers should
pay special attention to their eating habits at
these times. A considerable effort is demanded
of the slimmer and success depends on his or her
dedication. Adopting the 'restricted foods' type
of diets is undesirable for healthy people though
they may be necessary for patients with allergies
or other abnormalities. The most effective and
painless way to lose weight is first to choose
an ideal weight for the rest of one's life, then
to try and reduce one's diet by 200 calories a
day, through a mixed diet of skimmed milk, whole-wheat
grain, vegetables, poultry, fish, fruit and the
occasional egg - a diet which ensures an adequate
amount of all vitamins and minerals. If, additionally,
another 300 calories a day can be lost in physical
activity (an hour's brisk walking), this will
lead to a total daily reduction of 500 calories
and will result in a weekly loss of 500g (one
pound) of fat. Since it takes months to gain weight
it cannot, despite claims to the contrary, be
lost in a few days. The only solution is to learn
new eating habits and to keep them for life. Perhaps
the best rule of all to help achieve this is always:
'eat little of everything and nor too much of
anything' In health, as in all other worthwhile
pursuits, quick short-cuts actually never stand
a chance. Yet, since hope springs eternal in the
human breast and since people are even more gullible
than usual when it comes to health or slimming,
they will be only too willing to believe what
they read about instant loss of weight and will
try to buy hope, as if they were in a betting
shop or on the stock exchange. Inevitably they
will lose because, as with the other areas of
our lives, most great achievements have to be
earned the hard way.
Micronutrients
(Vitamins and Minerals)
Vitamins
Most
people have an adequate vitamin intake in their
diet, sufficient to ensure good health, yet in
the UK the annual over-the-counter-sales of packaged
vitamins is estimated at over £45 million.
Similar figures are found in other parts of the
Western world too. Although vitamin supplements
are rarely needed for normal adults, they should
be considered for: - people who rarely go into
the sunlight -- people with a restrictive diet,
such as vegetarians and other food faddists -
people with a poor intake, such as anorexics,
depressives and alcoholics - people of advanced
years - people, such as commercial travellers,
who regularly eat in canteens and low-price cafes
- people who live on packaged and 'fast' junk
food - convalescents, expectant nursing mothers,
infants, young children and adolescents. Here
are some concentrated sources of the five principal
vitamins: Vitamin A: liver, carrots, apricots,
spinach and cheddar cheese Vitamin B (complex):
brewer's yeast, unpolished rice, wheatgerm, whole
grains, liver, cheese, fish, yoghurt, nuts, pulses.
The essential Vitamin BY is required in tracer
doses. Except for yeast and seaweed it exists
almost exclusively in foods of animal origin such
as liver, most meats, milk, eggs and cheese. For
this reason vegetarians may experience deficiency.
Vitamin C: rose hip, fresh citrus fruits, cabbage,
red and green peppers, fresh green leaf vegetables,
strawberries and watercress. Nobel-prize Laureate
Dr Linus Pauling recommends high doses to maintain
the immunological defence system. Vitamin D: milk,
cheese, cod liver oil, herrings. Vitamin E: wheat
germ, whole wheat, almonds, peanuts.
Minerals
All
minerals essential for health are plentiful in
a mixed diet and mineral deficiency, therefore,
is rare. For example, in a well-balanced diet,
calcium is found in milk and cheeses, phosphorus
in all meat products and eggs, magnesium in bran
and nuts, iron in red meat, liver, black treacle
and baked beans and zinc in meat, offal and shellfish.
One
of the main functions of minerals is to keep a
perfect balance between many of the acid and alkaline
elements in the body. Sodium, potassium, calcium,
magnesium, manganese, iron and copper are alkaline
and iodine, phosphorus, chloride and sulphur are
of an acid producing nature, thus preventing an
alkaline excess. Sodium probably plays the most
important role in keeping a perfect balance between
the acid and alkaline elements in the body. The
desirable daily intake of sodium, usually in the
form of ordinary salt (sodium chloride), should
not exceed a quarter of a teaspoon (one teaspoon
has more than 2 grams). There is nothing good
about adding sodium to our foods, because it is
already in almost everything we eat in larger
quantities than we need; there is salt in mayonnaise,
cottage cheese, soya sauce, tomato sauce and a
long list of other foods.
Free
Radicals
A
free radical (sometimes also called an oxygen
radical) is an atom or a group of atoms with an
uneven electrical charge, meaning that these atoms
have acquired one surplus electron as a result
of oxidation and become extra-reactive and determined
to combine with something else. Inside the body
this something else is usually the DNA (the cell’s
genetic blueprint) from which, in order to complete
themselves, the radicals steal an extra electron;
this can set up a chain reaction during which
more free radicals are produced. These are then
available to damage more cells, thereby interfering
with normal cell production and initiating a mutation
- a change of chemistry and function - as a result
of which the cells will start dividing abnormally,
in an uncontrollable manner, which may ultimately
culminate in a cancerous growth. If the oxidative
process can be prevented there will be no atoms
with surplus electrons and so no mutation.
Free
radicals are formed by many normal reactions,
such as the presence of oxygen peroxide, or the
inhaling of oxygen. For example, unsaturated oils
such as vegetable oils, which are particularly
susceptible to free radical damage become rancid,
especially when heated.
The
body defends itself against free radicals by using
the small molecules that protect cellular DNA
from oxidative damage. The most important among
these are the three vitamins: A, C and E. The
reason, for example, that Vitamin A in carrots,
and carotene-containing yellow, red and green
vegetables, provides effective protection against
lung cancer in smokers, may be related to the
high level of oxidants in both cigarette-smoke
and tar, and how these are attacked by the carotene.
Selenium
Alternatively,
there are enzymes designed to disarm free radicals.
One such antioxidant enzyme is called glutathione
peroxidase (GP). its effective action depends
on the mineral selenium. When the dietary intake
of selenium is increased by a factor of ten the
activity of GP will be doubled. In a number of
studies it was found that people with a very low
selenium level had a greater chance of getting
cancer than those with a very high level. Similarly,
breast cancer rates in selenium-rich parts of
the world are unusually low.
Too
little dietary selenium is associated with an
increased risk of fatal cancer. What is more,
low Vitamin E intake may enhance this effect.
Selenium is abundant in meats, seafood, yeast,
eggs, liver, kidney, garlic, onions and mushrooms.
It is absent from refined foods, but ample supplies
always exist in a balanced mixed diet. An adequate
daily dose is 300 micrograms.
Uric
Acid
Another
antioxidant is uric acid. its high blood concentration
can be further increased by consumption of dietary
purins, but too much can cause gout. Foods high
in purins are sweet-breads, anchovies, sardines,
shrimps, mackerel, liver, kidney, meat extracts
and dried legumes. (In smokers a low uric acid
concentration may represent a contributory factor
to lung cancer.)
Summary
Vitamin
A, Vitamin C, Vitamin E, selenium and uric acid
have been shown to be the most important anti-carcinogenic
protective factors in our diet. Of these only
selenium and uric acid are toxic in too high concentrations:
Other
Minerals
Nitrates
A
great deal has been written about the danger from
nitrites and nitrates used against the deadly
botulism in the preparation of bacon and the curing
of various meats, because in the body they combine
with amines to produce nitrosamines, which are
known to be strong carcinogens in most animals.
Of course, traces of nitrosamines are found in
both bacon and some processed meats but traces
are also found in most vegetables such as spinach,
radishes, celery, lettuce and turnips. In any
case, nitrites are also found in human saliva
and it is therefore not surprising that there
is no evidence that in humans nitrite-treated
foods are carcinogenic.
Cyclamates
As
regards cyclamates, even in animals, more recent
repeat-tests have failed to confirm the development
of bladder tumours, following the original scare
in the USA in 1969, when eight out of 240 rats
on very high doses of cyclamates developed what
appeared to be bladder tumours, four of which
were subsequently confirmed as carcinomas.
Saccharin
Similarly,
saccharin appears to be quite safe. It has been
in use for 81 years and although three out of
100 rats fed huge amounts of saccharin developed
bladder tumours when the experiment was first
carried out in Canada in 1977 (resulting in the
banning of saccharin in Canada), the results of
these experiments have not since been confirmed
by other experiments.
In
any case, most epidemiological studies in humans
since 1977 have failed to show any relationship
between taking saccharin and bladder cancer. Significantly,
diabetics have a lower bladder cancer incidence
than that found in the rest of the population,
possibly also because diabetics smoke less heavily
than average.
There
is, therefore, no evidence that artificial sweeteners
such as cyclamates and saccharin cause cancer
in man, and they should both be considered safe.
Cooking
During
cooking, the outside of food can be burnt, for
instance on charcoal grilling of steaks at barbecues,
or when carbohydrates are caramelised, as on the
brown-crust of toasted bread. These burnt or caramelised
surfaces contain a large variety of DNA-damaging
agents, which are presumptive carcinogens, known
to produce cancer in animals. Good cooks do not
usually burn much of the food they are cooking,
but they do caramelise it.
The
total amount of such burnt material consumed may
be as much as several grams, a menacingly large
amount when compared with a mere half-gram of
burnt material inhaled in a single day by a person
smoking 20 cigarettes, and who as a direct result,
can expect a shortening of his or her life expectancy
by an average of eight years.
Cooking
also makes the oil and fat in meat go rancid and
this increases the number of oxygen radicals and
hence of presumptive carcinogens. Protecting ourselves
against these large numbers of oxygen radicals
should be a most important step in our campaign
to avoid cancer. We can do this by increasing
our consumption of uncooked food, avoiding burnt
or caramelised food and by taking plenty of Vitamin
E, Vitamin C, beta-carotene, selenium and uric
acid.
Coffee
One
cup of coffee contains 100 milligrams of caffeine
which at one time was thought capable of inhibiting
DNA repair thereby increasing the likelihood of
tumour formation following a mutation. Recently,
as a result of a survey of 14,000 coffee drinkers
who had been observed for 17 years, coffee has
been cleared of this suspicion. Scientists could
find no association between coffee and cancer,
despite a US survey three years ago that prompted
researchers to suggest that it might cause cancer
of the pancreas. These findings have been hotly
disputed ever since. It is thought that the answer
to the relationship between cancer of the pancreas
and increased coffee consumption reported by the
US scientists has been misinterpreted; it is now
suggested that it is the condition itself which
may cause the sufferers to drink more of everything,
including coffee, due to the body’s disturbed
glucose tolerance. It is thought that this factor,
which would directly affect the amount of coffee
consumed, was not taken into account by the US
researchers. (Yudkin et al., Lancet February 1984.)
On the other hand, it should not be forgotten
that browning and burning organic substances such
as roasting coffee beans, produces substances
which can damage DNA or inhibit its repair faculties.
Several such substances have been isolated so
it is a good idea to refrain from drinking too
many cups of coffee a day. Besides, frequent cups
of coffee or tea make people over-tensed and unable
to relax properly, this contributing to stress
instead of, as intended, relieving it.
Tea
and coffee act both as a drug and a stimulant;
as a drug they are habit forming, as a stimulant
they are nutritional stressors causing increased
general irritability.
Their
stimulating effect is due to the caffeine (or
theine) they contain. They are refreshing, because
they are served hot and because, in our minds,
we associate them with comfort and sympathy.
Dietary
Fibre
Dietary
fibre is the medical term for roughage ~ food;
it is the scaffolding that supports plants, giving
them their shape and strength. Modern research
has shown that as well as preventing constipation
it has many other beneficial effects yet it is
removed by modern food processing to our great
loss. Most fibre is a mixture of substances which
passes through our digestive system more or less
unchanged and unabsorbed.
It
was Dr Denis Burkitt who said that dietary fibre,
and in particular bran, might be important in
the prevention of bowel cancer. Bran is the husk,
or outer shell, of the wheat grain, and is not
used by human digestive enzymes. In whole-wheat
there are two types of fibre: crude fibre and
dietary fibre (which is finer and about five times
as plentiful). It contains complex carbohydrates
such as lignin which passes through the bowel
totally unchanged, cellulose, hexose and pentose
polymers. Pentose polymers are abundant in cereal
fibre, present to a lesser extent in other vegetables,
but do not occur in potatoes and are thought to
produce soft, bulky stools. It is probable that
the cancer-reducing effect of fibre is due to
the reduced time that the soft bulky stools remain
in the bowel. Also, this cancer-reducing effect
is increased by altering the total number and
proportions of different types of bacteria in
the bowel, some of which are capable of destroying
carcinogenic metabolites. Furthermore, the presence
of phytic acid in bran inhibits the iron mediated
formation of the free oxygen radicals. In this
way colonic carcinogenesis can be suppressed by
bran and other diets rich in iron binding phytic
acid.
These
findings are confirmed by reports from Scandinavia
where there is close correlation between bulky
stools containing pentose polymer and phytic acid
and low large-bowel cancer. This is the case in
rural Finland where diets include large amounts
of unrefined rye bread; the stools are bulky and
the incidence of large-bowel cancer low. The opposite
is true in Copenhagen, where the chief difference
from the Finnish diet seems to be a much smaller
consumption of unrefined cereals.
Because
of its vital importance to health, it is worth
repeating that eating vegetables, fruit and high-fibre
foods, will not only supply far fewer calories,
but by virtue of their bulk, will tend to prolong
the ‘full-up’ feeling thus reducing appetite and
promoting bowel movement (intestinal peristalsis).
This is very important because constipation is
still one of the commonest disabilities in the
affluent West and laxatives are in such great
demand that £4 million are spent on them
each year in Great Britain and $49 million in
the USA.
|